Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Change Observer

About
Submissions
Contact


Departments

Audio
Bibliography
Case Studies
Collections
Dialogues
Essays
Event-Aspen
Event-Bellagio
Event-Education
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
Video


Topics

Advertising
Aid
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Media
Motion Design
Museums
Nature
Obituary
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public Art
Religion
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Volunteerism
Water


Comments (20) Posted 05.24.10 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Essay

The Subtle Technology of Indian Artisanship


Ken Botnick and Ira Raja


A jugaad being repaired along the highway from Ajmer to Udaipur in Rajasthan. Photos: Ken Botnick

Everywhere you look in India you will find evidence of the maker’s hand. Signs painted on walls, trucks ornamented and painted with messages, cooking utensils, hand-woven and printed clothing, ritual religious objects, any number of containers made from recycled metals — even the famous jugaad vehicles cobbled together from spare parts for new lives as trucks and tractors — are just a few of the handmade objects. These articles are made with such remarkable ingenuity and embellished with such attention to detail that India could easily be considered more “high touch” than high tech. But is there anything to be learned from this intimate, hands-on, experiential culture that might be relevant to one that is becoming increasingly virtual?

An axiom popular in design circles today, “making is thinking,” implies that experiential knowledge is the most direct stimulus to innovation. The process of acquiring experiential knowledge, however, also involves an intimate relationship between the maker and his material. The maker must be familiar not only with where, when and how to source his material, but also with the best ways of giving it form. Craft culture, patronizingly referred to as “small-scale industry” by those who deal in steel and cement, is thus particularly well suited to innovation. This innovation, we argue, is the result of design thinking born from the maker’s acts of processing and shaping raw materials in his hands. We call this mode of design thinking based in the experience of craft “subtle technology.” We further propose that the Indian craftsman, faced with the demands of a population that is continually testing the limits of its resources, is uniquely placed to present us with a model for sustainability and innovation for contemporary design practice.


Bicycle saddle covers are an ingenious solution to the problem of making one's bike identifiable in a sea of identical models while at the same time extending the life of the seat

To the extent that a craftsman is connected to his art through personal experience, that relationship is impossible to replicate. When Indian management professionals, playing up to the current obsession with innovation, ask why they cannot seem to harness the authentically innovative spirit of the Indian streets, they fail to recognize that this kind of knowledge is by its nature unquantifiable. To draw on the ideas of the economist Friedrich Hayek, experiential knowledge is impossible to translate into statistics and cannot therefore be conveyed to any central authority in statistical form. Hayek argues that statistics are generated “precisely by abstracting from minor differences between the things, by lumping together, as resources of one kind, items which differ as regards location, quality, and other particulars.…” The process of generating statistics would thus seem to call for an elimination of the very life blood of innovation that lies in the knowledge of detail, such as only the “man on the spot” may possess. When business decides to disregard “mere detail” in the name of efficiency, it also chokes off the possibility for innovation that derives from the irreducible experientiality of artisanship.

Design might be thought of as a two-stage process, the functional and the elaborated. First, the functional requirement is fulfilled — a chair, a cup, a lamp, a sari. The process could end with the simple, usable object, but this lowest-common-denominator problem-solving is often not enough for both makers and users, who long for something more profound — an aesthetic “adjustment,” a deliberate attempt to make the functional object beautiful. This is usually done through the addition of color or the elaboration of form, both essential components of the practice of embellishment. In her book Art and Intimacy, ethologist Ellen Dissanayake calls it the process of “making special.” But as Dissanayake is careful to point out, making something special is not only making it beautiful. Positioning herself against conventional histories of humanity where the artistic impulse is considered to be a relatively late development, Dissanayake argues that, on the contrary, it was a primal impulse, located in the intimate reciprocity of the mother-child interaction. The “special” for Dissanayake thus arises equally from a transcultural desire for beauty and a basic human need for intimacy, both of which are fulfilled in the creative act of elaboration.

Elaboration connects the maker (and user) to a unique cultural context by employing shared aesthetics in color, pattern and materials, even as it enables makers to mark the object with their individual stamp, their personality — to announce to the world their role as creator. Handloomed saris from across India, for example, use modes of embellishment — colors, textures, motifs, types of weave, print or embroidery — that allow the discerning viewer to establish the object’s origins at once within a particular region of India. At the same time, each handloomed sari is one of a kind, allowing the weaver to claim it as a special creation. To the extent that the wearer is conscious of its unique quality, the buying of a sari might be thought of as the currency of intimacy between the maker and user, the mark of the maker’s hand representing almost a personal gesture for the owner.

Since raw material is usually expensive, the craftsman must know how to make the most of what he’s got. This often brings to the fore his economical genius for gathering, managing and storing materials. It is only through working the material repeatedly that the craftsman becomes familiar with its properties well enough to coax it into shape. But while we see the craftsman’s contribution as his genius for forming material, we rarely give him credit for more abstract design thinking about the broad implications of his creation.

One striking example of this is found in the unstitched garments of India, the sari and lunghi. The genius of these garments is in their simplicity; rectangles that wrap the body in a variety of ways, saris and lunghis defy changes in size and body shape. Because they are not elaborately shaped as western apparel is, they are endlessly adaptable, and certain classic textiles remain in style year after year. The simplicity of the sari’s shape also gives rise to a spectacular variety in designs of the textile itself, inviting infinite elaboration of color and pattern as invented by the textile weavers, printers and dyers. The rectangle further invites adaptive reuse once it is too threadbare to be worn as a sari any longer. Across India, old saris find new lives as pillows, pouches, ropes, lightweight blankets, hammocks for babies and more. They are even used as fences in Rajasthan. Such applications would be impossible if the original design were not so ingeniously simple, so functionally pure. A new sari would hold the wind too well to be a useful fence, and if its shape were more complex, its afterlife would be limited to ragstock. The sari, therefore, in its simplicity represents a mode of design thinking grounded in adaptability, innovation and sustainability based in craft that is distinctively Indian.


Sari fence in Rajasthan

If saris and lunghis point to the collective genius of Indian design, then hand-painted signs on the streets of India suggest a more individualized agency. Hand lettering follows much of the same pattern of other craft areas but with a wholly different outcome, in that it doesn’t produce a useable object. The flowering of signs and symbols points us to a universe of concrete language. The sign painters are amazingly adaptive as they explore new ways of creating familiar letterforms in a bid to capture the client’s eye and stand out in the crowd.


For this sign displayed in Parvathagiri, Andhra Pradesh, the painter used a combination of approaches to depth that result in a surprisingly fresh composition


This underwear sign presents an example of innovative thinking about space. Finding a drain opening in the path of his endeavors, the artist spontaneously incorporated a navel (and home for a mynah bird)

Indian sign painters have long used graphic devices to give their work a three-dimensional quality, as if to produce an illusion of space that is deeper than the board on which the words are painted. This tendency might be considered a shared aesthetic among sign painters, a cultural norm. To render a letter with the illusion of depth is not as simple as it looks, but can be accomplished only with knowledge of certain attributes of visual depth perception.


Decorated dung huts in Rajasthan

Embellishment is not only a means of celebrating life. Sometimes it is also an act of defiance in the face of finitude. The exterior surfaces of dung huts (known as batoda in Rajasthani) are decorated by the women who own them as a means of claiming them publicly as possessions and expressing pride in their beauty and neatness compared to those of their neighbors. Could it be that even the humblest of things — a heap of dung that will soon end up as fuel in the fire — is worthy of the extra time it takes to elaborate its existence, to celebrate it? The maker of the batoda doesn’t usually have the luxury of time, yet she finds the time to make her work special, to take it beyond the realm of the ordinary and the unadorned.


Even the sides of the bucket attached to this massive backhoe have been decorated with welded strips of metal. A repair job or pure aesthetic adventure?

In conclusion, on India’s streets, the act of making functional things — cups, chairs, signs, books — is creativity at its most direct expression; meeting a need. Embellishing that object, making it special, requires that the maker take time with the thing to ask more questions, not only about its function, but also about the person who will use it, and about how to distinguish that object from the universe of things that surround it. Embellishing is the way we identify the object as part of a larger cultural tradition, through colors, symbols, patterns, or even language. It is what takes a generic, functional article and places it firmly in a larger cultural reference. It simultaneously makes the object more reflective of the maker’s distinct personality and brings it into the shared cultural values of beauty and function. Embellishment delights because it surprises. It is found in completely unsuspecting places, like the bucket of a backhoe. It takes ordinariness and celebrates it as if to say, “Hah! You didn’t find this beautiful, this lump of dung, but here it is and it is beautiful.” Embellishment, like adaptation, is an act of claiming agency that marks the agent as both an individual and part of a community.

Note: The authors are indebted to Ellen Dissanayake for her influential work on the origins of artistic practice.
Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


Building After Auschwitz


Accidental Mysteries, 02.17.13


Cycle Commerce: The Red Blood Cells of a Smart City


90 Years of Chinese Communism: A Multimedia Celebration


Flickr Collection of the Week: Construtivist Posters



RSSSubscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (20)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Excellent article that captures the spirit quite well. The point is how experiential learning and knowledge can be embraced and used for developing knowledge and skills in others.
Dibyendu De
05.24.10 at 03:21

Beautifully written article, and I especially appreciate your point about claiming agency.

The amazing thing about Indian design, and the way Indians interact with objects is the blurred line between maker and user. In a sense, everyone is a maker, because everyone engages with material, adds to it, and claims agency. So yes, embellishment marks the maker as part of a community, but also marks the material as the maker's and as the community's. The lines of power, and rights, are only fluidly marked, and anyone may adapt and embellish.

The particular images you have chosen are, of course, brilliant! Love the backhoe!!
Avinash Rajagopal
05.24.10 at 05:54

It is really amazing this sense of design in every aspect of life in India. Thanks for this nice post.
cuisiniste independant
05.24.10 at 11:21

Hey, i so happy to see that we are shedding our glossy sunglasses. And looking at India's jugaad and slum tech solutions in new light. Because frankly i see few Indian's even think of it as thinking. After travelling over15 states i see an echo in the article. On numerous occasions, Indian 'design thinking' as we have come to know it has existed for not just decades, centuries but for millenniums - But in classic Indian style - we tend to overlook it. In a country of billions small things tend to get lost. I am only hoping Indian product designers start getting in genuine and continue the home grown spirit!
vikram
05.25.10 at 08:37

Thanks Ken and Ira. I've noted elsewhere examples of Indian bottom-up creativity touching on service design: http://www.randomspecific.com/mumbai-markings and have commented at length on Indian street graphics: http://www.randomspecific.com/indo-centric-typo-centric where I echo your concluding remarks that 'Embellishment, like adaptation, is an act of claiming agency that marks the agent as both an individual and part of a community.' Its great to have my perspectives widened still further by this insightful discussion.
Meena Kadri
05.25.10 at 10:44

claiming agency is establishing relationship but also...identity formed, location in the broadest sense. music finds place too. But our objects have special power in helping us figure out where and who we are. plus they might churn butter or keep our hindsides more comfortable on our bicycles.
robert schelling
05.26.10 at 10:45

It's nice to know how design thinking is so omnipresent in India in so many different ways. Thanks for the article.
Ian Wright
05.27.10 at 12:35

"Is there anything to be learned from this intimate, hands-on, experiential culture that might be relevant to one that is becoming increasingly virtual?"

Yes. Indians retain their claim to native arts. Why? Perhaps it has to do with poverty. Or with an agriculture that still depends in large part on the hands of individuals seeking to feed their own families.

Here in America, we once had a claim to a similar birthright. Our forebears made things, often beautifully, from what they had. Some people still do, and their work is equally beautiful, innovative, appropriate. But we seem to have happily traded such beauties for a mess of pottage from Walmart (our largest private employer). It seems to me that we have traded art for "design."

In the previous century, Ananda Coomaraswamy interpreted Indian arts to the west, but not at all in terms of design. He said that "The basic error in what we have called the illusion of culture is the assumption that art is something to be done by a special kind of man, and particularly that kind of man whom we call a genius. In direct opposition to this is the normal and humane view that art is simply the right way of making things, whether symphonies or airplanes.

"Manufacture is for use and not for profit. The artist is not a special kind of man, but every man who is not an artist in some field, every man without a vocation, is an idler. The kind of artist that a man should be, carpenter, painter, lawyer, farmer, or priest, is determined by his own nature, in other words by his nativity. No man has a right to any social status who is not an artist."

Art, at least according to its original meanings, as a way of fitting things together, requires manufacture (handwork) for the purpose of use by yet other hands. To make things that will be of real use to others is a vocation, a calling that can be measured only by the joy and gratitude of those who participate. Design, on the other hand, as commonly practiced, is an adjunct of machine industry, and largely defined by the language of advertising and marketing. It serves primarily to expand consumption and can be measured only in imaginary numbers of non-nutritive dollars.

Indeed, what we must admit, if not learn, is that "virtual" culture is no culture at all; true art requires true men and women who work with the materials at hand, to serve and to feed neighbors that they know.
kiko denzer
05.28.10 at 12:41

Fantastic article. Loved the points.
Loved the section on the design marvel of the sari and the lunghi!

Thanks for writing it so well too.
Kshitiz Anand
05.28.10 at 07:32

I love that every object created by hand is as unique as the creator who created it and the users that use it...perfect.
Tina
05.29.10 at 08:58

A lot of us (designers) have a tendency to "look outside" not "in" when it comes to taking inspiration. We follow global trends and forecasts but often forget or overlook what our own country has to offer...this article very interestingly, brings out the essence of how the very mundane things in life, if looked at closely, offer the best source of inspiration to us.
Also, the aspect of individuality that is expressed through embellishments is very much prevalent here too as much it is anywhere else in the world.
Thanks for the lovely article.
Tushita Singh
05.30.10 at 05:09

Every society from the Stone Age onward has designed artifacts. These were unique solutions to immediate needs. The artisans gained ritual and sometimes spiritual, as well as economic, satisfaction from their work.

It is only since the onset of mass manufacturing that we have depersonalized the sense of well being that accompanies "making." The British and Americans still possessed it until about 1850-1900, and people like Wm. Morris attempted to revive it, but it is now like a mutated gene. Putting technology back in its bottle will prove as challenging as reversing the environmental degradation that results from it.

There is hope that awareness of the condition as it exists in places like India might help us. But the citizens of the so-called "advanced societies" will first need to temper their remote sensory habits by getting their hands a little dirty.

Thanks for your insights.

http://design-altruism-project.org
david stairs
05.30.10 at 07:35

kiko denzer Wrote:
''Yes. Indians retain their claim to native arts. Why? Perhaps it has to do with poverty. Or with an agriculture that still depends in large part on the hands of individuals seeking to feed their own families.''

You are wrong here, poverty has nothing to do with art. Art has been part of indian culture or tradition through every respect, whether it is festivals,utensils, clothes, food,etc, for 1000's of years. Unfortunately goverment efforts are still not enough to protect such art and artisans of the country. Every 500 km in india the art varies, which is vivid and beautiful. This artisans can easily give up their art and look for other work, but as I said it is part of tradition, culture and so they will keep art alive even if they do anything else. Hats off to them that they are keeping such a rich heritage alive.

India is a argriculture country, which has been prime factor in Indian development and will remain so. Indiviuals you are talking about are farmers and they are proud owner of the their land. Many farmers have their sons and daughters as engineers and doctors, so it is not somebody is forced but it is about the choice.
Mayank
05.30.10 at 07:55

I'm glad to see more and more visibility and voice being given to the organic and anonymous forms of ingenuity, innovation and aesthetic practices in India. Speaking from an ongoing residency in Sweden, I can only plead for the strengthening of the rich and socially-embedded "cultural services ecosystem" as illustrated here that enable ordinary Indians to be creative and enjoy greater control and autonomy over their material life - unlike those in the more industrialized cultures, where the only role left for the ordinary citizen typically is that of choosing between several products or brands - or at best try and subvert the 'choice' that is made available to her/him - with very little agency. The lead for this has to be taken by the industrialized countries (in their own interest) because India is irreversibly following the development vector as laid out by them, and cannot provide the vision and leadership that she is eminently qualified to do, but cannot.
Arvind Lodaya
05.30.10 at 09:49

A response to this post from Indian design thinker Niti Bhan: http://bit.ly/bgOCVN
Meena Kadri
05.31.10 at 06:14

This article is not just thought-provoking and insightful, any one of the subjects touched upon here could be a chapter in a book.

I hope the authors, Ken Botnick and Ira Raja, will consider expanding this piece into something broader and deeper.
michael byron
06.03.10 at 01:14

Great, article. Like we say "beauty in the hands of the beholder", this contry is a "kannige habba"-in Kannada. Those who can appreciate it are the blessed.All the very best is all I have to say to the author.
lavanya
06.04.10 at 01:40

An insightful article--thank you.

I believe though, that poverty does play a role. As long as there remains such a huge surplus of cheap manual labor (including artisans), there will be little incentive to shift to an industrial, mass produced version. This is as true of washing machines (one of which remains lovingly unused under a cloth in mother's courtyard), which are more expensive and irregular to run (given the vagaries in water and bijli) than the reliable dhobi to employ; similarly, it is true of the sign-maker, whose artful labor remains cheaper than investing in an off-set printer capable of banner-size posters.

This is not to negate the love for and skill in making art, just to say that yes, indeed, poverty is a factor in this scenario.
ashasekh
06.22.10 at 01:40

Thank you Ken and Ira for pointing out the many instances of design thought put into common everyday elements - otherwise just observed fleetingly without much thought. Looking at these elements, opens up a window to their creators and makes you wonder about them at a personal level.
Seema Anthony
07.01.10 at 07:50

I'd also add that the regularity of experience that multinationals like Pepsi and McDonald's strive for to maintain their brand has been a pressure against sign painters in India. It is cheaper for Pepsi to hire sign painters and they do so but only until they develop something within reach to regularize the pepsi image that can be sent to villages. This article in Design Issues by G Mathur describes the dwindling of sign painting as a trade in India:
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/074793605774597497
Gleems
07.18.10 at 12:42



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Ken Botnick, designer and teacher, was a 2005–2006 Fulbright Fellow at the National Institute of Design in Ahmadabad, India, and has continued his relationship with Indian craft and design through yearly excursions, most currently directing the Village India Program for Washington University at St Louis in Andhra Pradesh.
More Bio >>

Ira Raja is an assistant professor in English at the University of Delhi, India, and a postdoctoral fellow at La Trobe University, Australia
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS