Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Change Observer

About
Submissions
Contact


Departments

Audio
Bibliography
Case Studies
Collections
Dialogues
Essays
Event-Aspen
Event-Bellagio
Event-Education
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
Video


Topics

Advertising
Aid
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Media
Motion Design
Museums
Nature
Obituary
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public Art
Religion
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Volunteerism
Water


Comments (11) Posted 03.17.10 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Project

One Car Per Family


Phil Patton


Yves Béhar's "people's car" concept based on OLPC principles

A highlight of last month’s Greener Gadgets conference in New York was a cute, emerald-colored product designed by Yves Béhar of FuseProject that is aimed for citizens of the developing world who might never have dreamed of possessing such an object.

Not a computer this time, but a car.

Inspired by what he learned as the industrial designer on the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project, Béhar presented a similarly conceived bare-bones automobile concept whose flexible design encourages do-it-yourself modification. Intended for dirt roads and in areas of undependable or no power infrastructure, the car is projected to have electrically driven wheels, but to accept various power plants. These might include batteries and charger, a small internal combustion engine, a hybrid system or even — in a scientifically over-optimistic suggestion — solar panels.

Just as the OLPC computer is customizable to encourage children to expand its utility, Béhar says, he made the car “hackable” so it could be powered and configured in any number of ways and even serve as a de facto portable generator. The front and rear forms are symmetrical, for easier and cheaper fabrication.

It would work well in China or India, Béhar believes, where he sees the electric vehicle infrastructure growing rapidly. “The developing world can leapfrog us in many ways, and this is one of them,” he said. He regards established auto companies as “very much stuck in a design rut.

“They need original design briefs and 21st-century business models.”
      
Intended as a set of ideas — a schematic and not a literal blueprint — Béhar’s “people’s car” was inspired by the Citroën 2CV (“Deux Chevaux”), the legendary French peasant car conceived for farmers to carry crops to market over dirt roads. Like the Model T Ford, the 2CV was rugged, had high clearance and was easily adaptable to other vehicle types. Béhar has continued this modularity with sketches of his little car transformed into a taxi, truck and ambulance.


Like the Citroën 2CV, Béhar's car can easily assume a range of vehicle types

And of course, he isn’t alone in his inspiration. Chrysler attempted a similar car with its Composite Concept Vehicle (CCV), designed by Bryan Nesbitt in 1997 for rural China as a conscious echo in more than name only of the 2CV. That car was to be built of composite panels from recycled soda bottles, simply assembled without tools and easy to repair. But the Chinese rejected it as naïve and condescending.

Instead, China adopted the automobile from the top down, with Buicks, the car owned both by last emperor Pu Yi and Republic of China leader Sun Yat-sen, leading the way. China’s highways were improved at a much faster rate than anticipated, though not at the expense of high-speed train lines.

Tata Motors’s Nano offers another take on the 2CV. Referring to a “Nano effect,” Geoff Wardle, director of advanced mobility research at Art Center College of Design, suggests that this small people’s car of India has made engineers and consumers everywhere think differently about all modes of transport. If Tata can produce a family car for $2000, Wardle says, which is about the average annual income in India, why not a cheaper motorbike or bicycle for everyone?

In some ways the 2CV is an imperfect archetype for cars designed for contemporary China, India or Africa. The French auto market had been established and growing for nearly 50 years before it came on the scene, conceived in a gesture of noblesse oblige by Citroën executive Pierre Boulanger as he toured French villages in 1936. His famous design mandate for the 2CV was summed up in a colorful image: to carry a dozen eggs across a plowed field without breaking them.

Influence even cuts the other way, with designs for the developing world having strange echoes in the developed one. Those ubiquitous windup manual power flashlights or radios, originally conceived for areas beyond the grid, have been widely purchased as emergency equipment in affluent countries. (They make sense for the auto glove box, where heat and cold quickly sap the batteries of conventional flashlights.)

The 2CV, similarly, came to appeal to French urbanites at least as much as to peasants. Samuel Beckett famously drove one in gray.

As Avinash Rajagopal suggested in his recent review of a Nano exhibition for Change Observer, many are resistant to providing cars of any kind to emerging nations. The automobile has the key disadvantage of wasting space and energy. But it also has the powerful benefit of offering flexibility for route and schedule, aiding entrepreneurs and leaders. The Model T and the 2CV revealed the car as a tool for innovation. The challenge is to avoid the problems of blight and traffic snarls while taking advantage of the benefits. Think of something like private-eye Precious Ramotswe’s little white Nissan truck in The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency, which she uses to build a small business, relate to a wider community and reveal information.

What Béhar’s concept supplies is an emphasis on versatility to fit unanticipated effects of design for developing areas. His ideal of “hackability” is desirable because it means pushing design downward to those who use things. It means putting innovation in the hands of the owner.
Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


MoMA's Modern Women


Transensing: Glassware for the Blind


When Modernists Get Crafty


Louise Fili


A Michelangelo, at 100 mph Plus



RSSSubscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (11)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Innovative + humanitarian: design we need we to see on greater abundance! Impressive.
Piper Maxwell
03.18.10 at 01:58

Personally, I believe we need to rethink mobility at a much more fundamental level. The problem isn't the internal combustion engine, it's the car-as-presently-conceived.

Much as I generally admire Yves, this is more of the kind of thinking that got us into the mess we're in now.
AG
03.18.10 at 06:08

Agree with AG on the matter.

The road of industrial progress marked by Fordism and car concept for personal / family mobility is akin to the Schrödinger cat experiment in which we've opened the box and found the cat dead.

Ken
03.18.10 at 11:48

AG is on to something.

maybe back to two wheeled carts pulled by pack animals or human power is better. or better yet, maybe we should just picture a world where everyone and everything stays put... mobility is so B.C...
bill
03.19.10 at 02:49

I don't believe that AG or Yves Behar want a future free of single-user transportation. Besides, I doubt that a taco truck could be modified to sell IKEA.

Mr. Behar's model explores the idea that people need a basic method of transporting themselves and their belongings (or saleable goods), with emphasis placed on cost, power- and form-factor flexibility.

But I do agree with Ken that there is room to innovate. What if instead of having a flexible four-wheel platform, we have two-wheel scooter platforms that could be connected together with a bin or flatbed assembly transport larger goods? Lightweight, efficient, flexible, and reversible.
Enrico Limcaco
03.19.10 at 12:53

In terms of his approach, Yves Behar might be onto something, especially for the Indian rural/semi-urban market.

Outside the urban scenario, there is already tremendous amount of "design hacking" in the field of transportation design: old jeeps become de facto trucks, and old motorcycles are converted into an ingenious form of public transport called the chhakda. Google Images obliges, as always, with some excellent photographs: http://bit.ly/bPeZjk

But my contention is that when they can design vehicles for themselves, people in rural India tend to design communal vehicles rather than personal transport. The Chhakda is one colourful example, there are many others (shared auto-rickshaws, rental jeeps...).

I hope some visionary automaker actually introduces an affordable, hackable, "sandbox" automobile for rural India. Then we will really see some fun!
Avinash Rajagopal
03.19.10 at 08:52

Just because it's a concept, why does it have to look so ugly?
Md
03.24.10 at 11:38

A good concept, but the actual design of the vehicle is questionable.

Surely the car is set too low for a more rougher terrain/ roads?
And in these very densely populated places, minor crashes and is quite common - this car seem to be built using very large parts, meaning that you'd have to replace a large bit of the car (costing more?)

Also, is the design made for children? Personally, I find the design patronizing and offending.
Martin
03.25.10 at 07:28

They need our help. Thank you for stepping up and for thinking responsibly.
Rocco Piscatello
03.25.10 at 10:06

Aren't the people who buy these kinds of ugly design car concepts green thumbed city dwellers anyway? In that case, we need fewer cars and roads; more bikes and bike lanes. Design Observer should be covering bike culture and how it can revolutionize the American dream.
Michèle Champagne
03.29.10 at 09:15

I actually agree with you Michèle Champagne. Though the idea of having a bike is for a single person, it should be best for greener environment that they are shouting for.. Now, for car parts shops and distributors, a car, make it green, can be very much convenient.. so both have advantages, and disadvantages..
Dan
01.24.11 at 10:31



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Phil Patton is an author and curator who writes on autos for The New York Times.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS