Design Observer

Archive
Books + Store
Job Board
Email Archive
Comments
About
Contact
Log In
Register



Change Observer

Resources
Submissions
About
Contact


Departments

Audio
Bibliography
Case Studies
Collections
Dialogues
Essays
Event-Aspen
Event-Bellagio
Event-Education
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
Video


Topics

Advertising
Aid
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Media
Motion Design
Museums
Nature
Obituary
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public Art
Religion
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Volunteerism
Water


Comments (1) Posted 02.07.11 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Report

Hester Street Collaborative


Ernest Beck


Hester Street Collaborative's P.S. 134 community garden project. Photo: Hester Street Collaborative

Architects want to give back to society by designing for the public good. But how? Pro bono projects are the most common route, promoted by organizations like Public Architecture, which launched an initiative in 2005 to encourage firms to donate a minimum of 1 percent of their working time to volunteer service. More than 750 firms have signed up, yet pro bono efforts depend on a host of variables — from participants' available time and resources to the practice's economic health. For Marc Turkel, Morgan Hare and Shawn Watts, partners in Leroy Street Studio, a small architecture firm in New York’s Lower East Side/Chinatown neighborhood, the solution has been a two-pronged approach: to integrate community design elements into a practice that services a broad cross-section of clients, and separately, to nurture an autonomous nonprofit unit, the Hester Street Collaborative (HSC), that spearheads community design programs. Taken together, they form an unusual model in the field of design and social change.

The concept for HSC evolved from a project Turkel and Hare had previously worked on for the East New York Urban Youth Corporation to renovate the lobby and courtyard spaces at an affordable housing project and community center. The idea was to bring in artists and tile-makers to collaborate with tenants. The effort "gave people a voice and helped them to figure out how to improve a seriously neglected public space," Turkel says, "and added a layer of joy to public projects that otherwise don't have the funding." It also inspired the architects to create HSC in 2002, as a way of continuing long-term projects focused on community involvement.

One-off pro-bono projects often "cannot provide the infrastructure for a committed program, and we wanted to find a way to sustain the commitment," says Anne Frederick, an architect who started working at Leroy Street Studio and is now executive director of HSC.

With a five-person staff and an annual budget of around $400,000, HSC enjoys a symbiotic relationship with Leroy Street: they share office space and donate design services. Other funding comes from a variety of sources, including city, state and federal cultural offices, the NEA, foundations, the NYC Department of Education and earned income sources like the Chinatown YMCA.

One of HSC's first efforts was a project for Middle School 131, a public school with a large enrollment of recent Chinese immigrants that is located across the street from the Leroy Street Studio office. The architects put together a design education program that included building a sculpture garden with the students. “The idea wasn’t to create the next generation of architects and designers, but to allow students to improve their environment,” Frederick explains. In another project, HSC collaborates with the city on People Make Parks, which helps community groups navigate capital development projects for urban green space, from how to advocate for funding to influencing design decisions.

For the East River Waterfront redevelopment project, HSC worked with the grassroots O.U.R. Waterfront Coalition on a “visioning process” that channeled community views into a “people’s plan” for the waterfront, as a counterpoint to one proposed by New York City’s Economic Development Corporation. The people’s plan, based on extensive surveys of community groups, includes options for a park with sufficient open spaces, free or low-cost recreational facilities and health, education and cultural facilities that could be built — and operated for a year — on a $55 million budget. By comparison, the city’s $138 million plan did not include many of these features while giving priority, the coalition says, to high-end retail and commercial development along the waterfront.

At Leroy Street Studio, architects are still engaged in projects for paying clients. But they continue to diversify their practice to incorporate many of the goals and ideals that also underpin HSC, such as giving their clients, whoever they are, a strong voice. Leroy Street has worked on libraries in under-performing elementary schools, master planning for a new waterfront Brooklyn park, and the creation of a design construction management company, BLDG, that seeks to deliver better design on a tighter budget. “We operate independently,” Frederick says, “but we’re united in our philosophy about how architecture can play a role in system change.”
|
Share This Story

RSSSubscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (1)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

I saw Morgan Hare speak at Structures for Inclusion '09 in Dallas, where one of his salient points was that People Make Parks and the middle school projects created a sense of ownership for the clients over spaces that are very important for the rhythm of their daily lives. 'Ownership' might be a bit loose as a driving principle or concept, but anyone who is familiar with the gentrification in that part of town over the past 30 years knows that having a modicum of control over your neighborhood goes a long way.

Architects, and especially landscape architects, have the contacts at the city planning departments, zoning boards, etc necessary to translate that sense of ownership fostered in the design process into reality. We regularly put those networks to work in service to our fee generating clients-why not leverage them for a community action group as well?
Nick McClintock
02.10.11 at 02:05



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Ernest Beck is a New York-based freelance writer and editor.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









MORE BY Ernest Beck

06.21.11: San+Co
05.19.11: Project Mwana
04.27.11: Benefit Corporations
04.25.11: Hard Times for Hard Copy
03.23.11: Creative Support for Japan
03.07.11: IDEO.org
02.11.11: BOOM
02.10.11: GlobalTap Update
01.26.11: Mensch at Work
12.07.10: Cards of Change
More by Ernest Beck >>

RELATED POSTS


Architecture's Internship Requirement Needs a Redesign
An argument for rethinking architecture's internship requirement

Architecture Research Office
Interview with Stephen Cassell and Adam Yarinsky on the occasion of their National Design Award

Cuba Libre: Contemporary Architecture in Havana
Young architects struggle to update the face of Cuba.

My Studio H Experience
Adventures in design crits: A high school junior recounts her Studio H year working with onerous classmates and power tools.

Community Hero: Queens Museum of Art
Queens Museum of Art, a model for community service, breaks ground on new addition.